Papers › CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenes
CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenes
Yuhong Li, Xiaofan Zhang, Deming Chen
We propose a network for Congested Scene Recognition called CSRNet to provide a data-driven and deep learning method that can understand highly congested scenes and perform accurate count estimation as well as present high-quality density maps. The proposed CSRNet is composed of two major components: a convolutional neural network (CNN) as the front-end for 2D feature extraction and a dilated CNN for the back-end, which uses dilated kernels to deliver larger reception fields and to replace pooling operations. CSRNet is an easy-trained model because of its pure convolutional structure. We demonstrate CSRNet on four datasets (ShanghaiTech dataset, the UCF_CC_50 dataset, the WorldEXPO'10 dataset, and the UCSD dataset) and we deliver the state-of-the-art performance. In the ShanghaiTech Part_B dataset, CSRNet achieves 47.3% lower Mean Absolute Error (MAE) than the previous state-of-the-art method. We extend the targeted applications for counting other objects, such as the vehicle in TRANCOS dataset. Results show that CSRNet significantly improves the output quality with 15.4% lower MAE than the previous state-of-the-art approach.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1802.10062")
Code
Syntology Ran 5 of 15 code samples harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper; 10 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 15 samples from 4 repositories, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
15 samples harvested; 5 ran; 3 honoured the contract we drafted; 10 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 5 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
ce39b03640271550 · report
26d3609a29bca3ac · report
78634a059bd32f30 · report
70f82265ce8e8a4e · report
bd14ee2717325fe2 · report
699624a8df54b1f2 · report
804f70b76bd6432b · report
c0c074850363dcfc · report
2e7c732fa310801f · report
b58a2ec6960d759c · report
d78d232773b61dc2 · report
5448b1b07af1f412 · report
5c608855cf4b96b9 · report
ee85fe0942254f17 · report
0deef73b258cd476 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crowd Counting | ShanghaiTech A | CSRNet | MAE | 68.2 | #24 of 35 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowd Counting | ShanghaiTech B | CSRNet | MAE | 10.6 | #22 of 32 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowd Counting | TRANCOS | CSRNet | MAE | 3.56 | #4 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowd Counting | UCF CC 50 | CSRNet | MAE | 266.1 | #12 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowd Counting | Venice | CSRNet | MAE | 35.8 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Crowd Counting | WorldExpo’10 | CSRNet | Average MAE | 8.6 | #7 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections