Papers › Cross-modal Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence via Consistency Refining and Mining

Cross-modal Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence via Consistency Refining and Mining

25 Mar 2024IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2024 3archive 2025-07-28

Xinran Ma, Mouxing Yang, Yunfan Li, Peng Hu, Jiancheng Lv, Xi Peng

The success of existing cross-modal retrieval (CMR) methods heavily rely on the assumption that the annotated cross-modal correspondence is faultless. In practice, however, the correspondence of some pairs would be inevitably contaminated during data collection or annotation, thus leading to the so-called Noisy Correspondence (NC) problem. To alleviate the influence of NC, we propose a novel method termed Consistency REfining And Mining (CREAM) by revealing and exploiting the difference between correspondence and consistency. Specifically, the correspondence and the consistency only be coincident for true positive and true negative pairs, while being distinct for false positive and false negative pairs. Based on the observation, CREAM employs a collaborative learning paradigm to detect and rectify the correspondence of positives, and a negative mining approach to explore and utilize the consistency. Thanks to the consistency refining and mining strategy of CREAM, the overfitting on the false positives could be prevented and the consistency rooted in the false negatives could be exploited, thus leading to a robust CMR method. Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of our method on three image-text benchmarks including Flickr30K, MS-COCO, and Conceptual Captions. Furthermore, we adopt our method into the graph matching task and the results demonstrate the robustness of our method against fine-grained NC problem. The code is available on https://github.com/XLearning-SCU/2024-TIP-CREAM .

PaperPDFCode

Code

XLearning-SCU/2024-TIP-CREAM mentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Cross-Modal RetrievalCross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondenceGraph MatchingRetrieval

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

CC152K

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence CC152K CREAM Image-to-text R@1 40.3 #7 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence CC152K CREAM Image-to-text R@10 77.1 #7 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence CC152K CREAM Image-to-text R@5 68.5 #7 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence CC152K CREAM R-Sum 372.6 #7 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence CC152K CREAM Text-to-image R@1 40.2 #7 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence CC152K CREAM Text-to-image R@10 78.3 #7 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence CC152K CREAM Text-to-image R@5 68.2 #7 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence COCO-Noisy CREAM Image-to-text R@1 78.9 #12 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence COCO-Noisy CREAM Image-to-text R@10 98.6 #12 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence COCO-Noisy CREAM Image-to-text R@5 96.3 #12 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence COCO-Noisy CREAM R-Sum 523 #12 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence COCO-Noisy CREAM Text-to-image R@1 63.3 #12 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence COCO-Noisy CREAM Text-to-image R@10 95.8 #12 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence COCO-Noisy CREAM Text-to-image R@5 90.1 #12 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence Flickr30K-Noisy CREAM Image-to-text R@1 77.4 #11 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence Flickr30K-Noisy CREAM Image-to-text R@10 97.3 #11 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence Flickr30K-Noisy CREAM Image-to-text R@5 95.0 #11 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence Flickr30K-Noisy CREAM R-Sum 502.3 #11 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence Flickr30K-Noisy CREAM Text-to-image R@1 58.7 #11 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence Flickr30K-Noisy CREAM Text-to-image R@10 89.8 #11 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-modal retrieval with noisy correspondence Flickr30K-Noisy CREAM Text-to-image R@5 84.1 #11 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Graph Matching PASCAL VOC CREAM matching accuracy 0.814 #17 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Graph Matching SPair-71k CREAM matching accuracy 0.851 #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Graph Matching Willow Object Class CREAM matching accuracy 0.988 #4 of 23 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections