Papers › Cross-Modal Implicit Relation Reasoning and Aligning for Text-to-Image Person Retrieval

Cross-Modal Implicit Relation Reasoning and Aligning for Text-to-Image Person Retrieval

22 Mar 2023CVPR 2023 1arXiv:2303.12501archive 2025-07-28

Ding Jiang, Mang Ye

Text-to-image person retrieval aims to identify the target person based on a given textual description query. The primary challenge is to learn the mapping of visual and textual modalities into a common latent space. Prior works have attempted to address this challenge by leveraging separately pre-trained unimodal models to extract visual and textual features. However, these approaches lack the necessary underlying alignment capabilities required to match multimodal data effectively. Besides, these works use prior information to explore explicit part alignments, which may lead to the distortion of intra-modality information. To alleviate these issues, we present IRRA: a cross-modal Implicit Relation Reasoning and Aligning framework that learns relations between local visual-textual tokens and enhances global image-text matching without requiring additional prior supervision. Specifically, we first design an Implicit Relation Reasoning module in a masked language modeling paradigm. This achieves cross-modal interaction by integrating the visual cues into the textual tokens with a cross-modal multimodal interaction encoder. Secondly, to globally align the visual and textual embeddings, Similarity Distribution Matching is proposed to minimize the KL divergence between image-text similarity distributions and the normalized label matching distributions. The proposed method achieves new state-of-the-art results on all three public datasets, with a notable margin of about 3%-9% for Rank-1 accuracy compared to prior methods.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2303.12501")

Code

Syntology Ran 5 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 9 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

anosorae/irra officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
4ran
4unverified

Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from anosorae/irra. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

AttentionPool2d anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic MIT (permissive) · 03b49fee1c4ea883 · report
ModifiedResNet anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic MIT (permissive) · 88e333b1d22a6f6a · report
VisionTransformer anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic MIT (permissive) · 8d1b78ed1b645333 · report
available_models anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic MIT (permissive) · 571e8713488818e6 · report
resize_pos_embed anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 46ab65070a560ea7 · report
CLIP anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 36986ffbd858f742 · report
IRRA anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · a09d9efccb4269b5 · report
_download anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · c86fa5cb055d987d · report
build_CLIP_from_openai_pretrained anosorae/irra/model/build.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 2d184b2be5eb0d13 · report

Tasks

Image-text matchingLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingMasked Language ModelingPerson RetrievalRetrievalText MatchingText based Person RetrievalText-based Person RetrievalText-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondencemultimodal interactiontext similarity

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Text based Person Retrieval ICFG-PEDES IRRA R@1 63.46 #8 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Text based Person Retrieval ICFG-PEDES IRRA R@10 85.82 #8 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Text based Person Retrieval ICFG-PEDES IRRA R@5 80.25 #8 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Text based Person Retrieval ICFG-PEDES IRRA mAP 38.06 #8 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Text based Person Retrieval ICFG-PEDES IRRA mINP 7.93 #8 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Text based Person Retrieval RSTPReid IRRA R@1 60.20 #7 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Text based Person Retrieval RSTPReid IRRA R@10 81.30 #7 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Text based Person Retrieval RSTPReid IRRA R@5 88.20 #7 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence CUHK-PEDES IRRA Rank 10 92.20 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence CUHK-PEDES IRRA Rank-1 69.74 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence CUHK-PEDES IRRA Rank-5 87.09 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence CUHK-PEDES IRRA mAP 62.28 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence CUHK-PEDES IRRA mINP 45.84 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence ICFG-PEDES IRRA Rank 1 60.76 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence ICFG-PEDES IRRA Rank-10 84.01 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence ICFG-PEDES IRRA Rank-5 78.26 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence ICFG-PEDES IRRA mAP 35.87 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence ICFG-PEDES IRRA mINP 6.80 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence RSTPReid IRRA Rank 1 58.75 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence RSTPReid IRRA Rank 10 88.25 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence RSTPReid IRRA Rank 5 81.90 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence RSTPReid IRRA mAP 46.38 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Text-based Person Retrieval with Noisy Correspondence RSTPReid IRRA mINP 24.78 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

ALIGN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections