Papers › Cross-lingual Argumentation Mining: Machine Translation (and a bit of Projection) is...

Cross-lingual Argumentation Mining: Machine Translation (and a bit of Projection) is All You Need!

24 Jul 2018COLING 2018 8arXiv:1807.08998archive 2025-07-28

Steffen Eger, Johannes Daxenberger, Christian Stab, Iryna Gurevych

Argumentation mining (AM) requires the identification of complex discourse structures and has lately been applied with success monolingually. In this work, we show that the existing resources are, however, not adequate for assessing cross-lingual AM, due to their heterogeneity or lack of complexity. We therefore create suitable parallel corpora by (human and machine) translating a popular AM dataset consisting of persuasive student essays into German, French, Spanish, and Chinese. We then compare (i) annotation projection and (ii) bilingual word embeddings based direct transfer strategies for cross-lingual AM, finding that the former performs considerably better and almost eliminates the loss from cross-lingual transfer. Moreover, we find that annotation projection works equally well when using either costly human or cheap machine translations. Our code and data are available at \url{http://github.com/UKPLab/coling2018-xling_argument_mining}.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

UKPLab/coling2018-xling_argument_mining officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

AllCross-Lingual TransferMachine TranslationTranslationWord Embeddings

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AM

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections