Papers › Criteria Comparative Learning for Real-scene Image Super-Resolution
Criteria Comparative Learning for Real-scene Image Super-Resolution
Yukai Shi, Hao Li, Sen Zhang, Zhijing Yang, Xiao Wang
Real-scene image super-resolution aims to restore real-world low-resolution images into their high-quality versions. A typical RealSR framework usually includes the optimization of multiple criteria which are designed for different image properties, by making the implicit assumption that the ground-truth images can provide a good trade-off between different criteria. However, this assumption could be easily violated in practice due to the inherent contrastive relationship between different image properties. Contrastive learning (CL) provides a promising recipe to relieve this problem by learning discriminative features using the triplet contrastive losses. Though CL has achieved significant success in many computer vision tasks, it is non-trivial to introduce CL to RealSR due to the difficulty in defining valid positive image pairs in this case. Inspired by the observation that the contrastive relationship could also exist between the criteria, in this work, we propose a novel training paradigm for RealSR, named Criteria Comparative Learning (Cria-CL), by developing contrastive losses defined on criteria instead of image patches. In addition, a spatial projector is proposed to obtain a good view for Cria-CL in RealSR. Our experiments demonstrate that compared with the typical weighted regression strategy, our method achieves a significant improvement under similar parameter settings.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
2 archive task tags without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections