Papers › Creative Diversity: Patterns in the Creative Habits of ~10,000 People
Creative Diversity: Patterns in the Creative Habits of ~10,000 People
Eric Berlow, Spencer Canon, Kaustuv DeBiswas, David Gurman, Shawna Jacoby, Lizbet Simmons, Andy Walshe, Rich Williams, Tiffany Yuan, Mark Runco
Despite popular media interest in uncovering the creative habits of successful people, there is a surprising paucity of empirical research on the diversity of tendencies and preferences people have when engaged in creative work. We developed a simple survey that characterized 42 creative habits along 21 independent dimensions. Data from 9,633 respondents revealed seven 'Creative Species', or clusters of people with combinations of creative habits that tend to co-occur more than expected by chance. These emergent clusters where relatively stable to random subsampling of the population and to variation in model parameters. The seven Creative Species self-sorted along a primary gradient from those characterized by more 'deliberate' creative habits (e.g., Monotasker, Risk Averse, Routine Seeker, Tenacious, Make it Happen) to those characterized by more 'open' creative habits (e.g. Multitasker, Risk Friendly, Novelty Seeker, Reframer, Let it Happen). A weaker second gradient was defined by outward and rational vs inward and intuitive creators. For the subset of respondents with data about their broad professional discipline (Art, Science, and Business) and gender, some groups were more (or less) common in some Creative Species than expected by chance, but the absolute magnitude of these differences were generally small; and knowing the discipline or gender of a person was not a good single predictor of their creative preferences or tendencies. Together these results suggest that independent of discipline or gender, people vary widely in the habits, behaviors, and contexts in which they feel most creative. Understanding creative diversity is critical for improving the creative performance of both individuals and collaborative teams.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections