Papers › CR-LSO: Convex Neural Architecture Optimization in the Latent Space of Graph...
CR-LSO: Convex Neural Architecture Optimization in the Latent Space of Graph Variational Autoencoder with Input Convex Neural Networks
Xuan Rao, Bo Zhao, Xiaosong Yi, Derong Liu
In neural architecture search (NAS) methods based on latent space optimization (LSO), a deep generative model is trained to embed discrete neural architectures into a continuous latent space. In this case, different optimization algorithms that operate in the continuous space can be implemented to search neural architectures. However, the optimization of latent variables is challenging for gradient-based LSO since the mapping from the latent space to the architecture performance is generally non-convex. To tackle this problem, this paper develops a convexity regularized latent space optimization (CR-LSO) method, which aims to regularize the learning process of latent space in order to obtain a convex architecture performance mapping. Specifically, CR-LSO trains a graph variational autoencoder (G-VAE) to learn the continuous representations of discrete architectures. Simultaneously, the learning process of latent space is regularized by the guaranteed convexity of input convex neural networks (ICNNs). In this way, the G-VAE is forced to learn a convex mapping from the architecture representation to the architecture performance. Hereafter, the CR-LSO approximates the performance mapping using the ICNN and leverages the estimated gradient to optimize neural architecture representations. Experimental results on three popular NAS benchmarks show that CR-LSO achieves competitive evaluation results in terms of both computational complexity and architecture performance.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10 | CR-LSO | Accuracy (Test) | 94.35 | #8 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10 | CR-LSO | Accuracy (Val) | 91.54 | #8 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100 | CR-LSO | Accuracy (Test) | 73.47 | #8 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100 | CR-LSO | Accuracy (Val) | 73.44 | #8 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120 | CR-LSO | Accuracy (Test) | 46.98 | #1 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120 | CR-LSO | Accuracy (Val) | 46.51 | #1 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections