Papers › Cosmological parameter estimation: impact of CMB aberration

Cosmological parameter estimation: impact of CMB aberration

9 Oct 2012arXiv:1210.2731links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Riccardo Catena, Alessio Notari

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The peculiar motion of an observer with respect to the CMB rest frame induces an apparent deflection of the observed CMB photons, {\it i.e.} aberration, and a shift in their frequency, {\it i.e.} Doppler effect. Both effects distort the temperature multipoles a_(ℓm)'s via a mixing matrix at {\it any} ℓ. The common lore when performing a CMB based cosmological parameter estimation is to consider that Doppler affects only the l=1 multipole, and neglect any other corrections. In this paper we check the validity of this assumption in parameter estimation for a Planck-like angular resolution, both for a full-sky ideal experiment and also when sky cuts are included to model CMB foreground contaminations with a sky fraction similar to the Planck satellite. Assuming a simple fiducial cosmological model with five parameters, we simulated CMB temperature maps of the sky and added aberration and Doppler effects to the maps. We then analyzed with a MCMC in a Bayesian framework the maps with and without aberration and Doppler effects in order to assess the ability of reconstructing the parameters of the fiducial model. Although the correction on the power spectrum C_ℓ is larger than the cosmic variance at ℓ>1000 and potentially important, we find that the bias on the parameters is negligible for Planck.

PaperPDFCode

Code

pdsferreira/cmb-aber-dopp mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections