Papers › Cosmic dissonance: new physics or systematics behind a short sound horizon?

Cosmic dissonance: new physics or systematics behind a short sound horizon?

17 Sep 2019arXiv:1909.07986links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Nikki Arendse, Radosław J. Wojtak, Adriano Agnello, Geoff C. -F. Chen, Christopher D. Fassnacht, Dominique Sluse, Stefan Hilbert, Martin Millon, Vivien Bonvin, Kenneth C. Wong, Frédéric Courbin, Sherry H. Suyu, Simon Birrer, Tommaso Treu, Leon V. E. Koopmans

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Persistent tension between low-redshift observations and the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (CMB), in terms of two fundamental distance scales set by the sound horizon r_d and the Hubble constant H₀, suggests new physics beyond the Standard Model or residual systematics. We examine recently updated distance calibrations from Cepheids, gravitational lensing time-delay observations, and the Tip of the Red Giant Branch. Calibrating the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Type Ia supernovae with combinations of the distance indicators, we obtain a joint and self-consistent measurement of H₀ and r_d at low redshift, independent of cosmological models and CMB inference. In an attempt to alleviate the tension between late-time and CMB-based measurements, we consider four extensions of the standard ΛCDM model. The sound horizon from our different measurements is r_d=(137±3^(stat.)±2^(syst.))~Mpc. Depending on the adopted distance indicators, the combined tension in H₀ and r_d ranges between 2.3 and 5.1 σ. We find that modifications of ΛCDM that change the physics after recombination fail to solve the problem, for the reason that they only resolve the tension in H₀, while the tension in r_d remains unchanged. Pre-recombination extensions (with early dark energy or the effective number of neutrinos N_(eff)=3.24 ±0.16) are allowed by the data, unless the calibration from Cepheids is included. Results from time-delay lenses are consistent with those from distance-ladder calibrations and point to a discrepancy between absolute distance scales measured from the CMB (assuming the standard cosmological model) and late-time observations. New proposals to resolve this tension should be examined with respect to reconciling not only the Hubble constant but also the sound horizon derived from the CMB and other cosmological probes.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Nikki1510/cosmic_dissonance officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections