Papers › COSMIC: COmmonSense knowledge for eMotion Identification in Conversations

COSMIC: COmmonSense knowledge for eMotion Identification in Conversations

6 Oct 2020Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2020arXiv:2010.02795archive 2025-07-28

Deepanway Ghosal, Navonil Majumder, Alexander Gelbukh, Rada Mihalcea, Soujanya Poria

In this paper, we address the task of utterance level emotion recognition in conversations using commonsense knowledge. We propose COSMIC, a new framework that incorporates different elements of commonsense such as mental states, events, and causal relations, and build upon them to learn interactions between interlocutors participating in a conversation. Current state-of-the-art methods often encounter difficulties in context propagation, emotion shift detection, and differentiating between related emotion classes. By learning distinct commonsense representations, COSMIC addresses these challenges and achieves new state-of-the-art results for emotion recognition on four different benchmark conversational datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/declare-lab/conv-emotion.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2010.02795")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 5 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

declare-lab/conv-emotion officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran
2unverified

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from declare-lab/conv-emotion. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

CommonsenseRNNCell declare-lab/conv-emotion/COSMIC/erc-training/commonsense_model.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 32139886344e5a52 · report
MatchingAttention declare-lab/conv-emotion/COSMIC/erc-training/commonsense_model.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · be2661853a7816fd · report
SimpleAttention declare-lab/conv-emotion/COSMIC/erc-training/commonsense_model.py official repository ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · ad8a445ef146180f · report
CommonsenseGRUModel declare-lab/conv-emotion/COSMIC/erc-training/commonsense_model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 8fad74fa071711d9 · report
CommonsenseRNN declare-lab/conv-emotion/COSMIC/erc-training/commonsense_model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 48792657b3c0b23c · report

Tasks

Emotion RecognitionEmotion Recognition in Conversation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Emotion Recognition in Conversation DailyDialog COSMIC Macro F1 51.05 #12 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Emotion Recognition in Conversation DailyDialog COSMIC Micro-F1 58.48 #12 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Emotion Recognition in Conversation EmoryNLP COSMIC Weighted-F1 38.11 #18 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Emotion Recognition in Conversation IEMOCAP COSMIC Weighted-F1 65.30 #43 of 59 Archive leaderboard report
Emotion Recognition in Conversation MELD COSMIC Weighted-F1 65.21 #33 of 68 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections