Papers › Copycat CNN: Are Random Non-Labeled Data Enough to Steal Knowledge from Black-box Models?
Copycat CNN: Are Random Non-Labeled Data Enough to Steal Knowledge from Black-box Models?
Jacson Rodrigues Correia-Silva, Rodrigo F. Berriel, Claudine Badue, Alberto F. de Souza, Thiago Oliveira-Santos
Convolutional neural networks have been successful lately enabling companies to develop neural-based products, which demand an expensive process, involving data acquisition and annotation; and model generation, usually requiring experts. With all these costs, companies are concerned about the security of their models against copies and deliver them as black-boxes accessed by APIs. Nonetheless, we argue that even black-box models still have some vulnerabilities. In a preliminary work, we presented a simple, yet powerful, method to copy black-box models by querying them with natural random images. In this work, we consolidate and extend the copycat method: (i) some constraints are waived; (ii) an extensive evaluation with several problems is performed; (iii) models are copied between different architectures; and, (iv) a deeper analysis is performed by looking at the copycat behavior. Results show that natural random images are effective to generate copycats for several problems.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections