Papers › Convincing Rationales for Visual Question Answering Reasoning
Convincing Rationales for Visual Question Answering Reasoning
Kun Li, George Vosselman, Michael Ying Yang
Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a challenging task of predicting the answer to a question about the content of an image. It requires deep understanding of both the textual question and visual image. Prior works directly evaluate the answering models by simply calculating the accuracy of the predicted answers. However, the inner reasoning behind the prediction is disregarded in such a "black box" system, and we do not even know if one can trust the predictions. In some cases, the models still get the correct answers even when they focus on irrelevant visual regions or textual tokens, which makes the models unreliable and illogical. To generate both visual and textual rationales next to the predicted answer to the given image/question pair, we propose Convincing Rationales for VQA, CRVQA. Considering the extra annotations brought by the new outputs, {CRVQA} is trained and evaluated by samples converted from some existing VQA datasets and their visual labels. The extensive experiments demonstrate that the visual and textual rationales support the prediction of the answers, and further improve the accuracy. Furthermore, {CRVQA} achieves competitive performance on generic VQA datatsets in the zero-shot evaluation setting. The dataset and source code will be released under https://github.com/lik1996/CRVQA2024.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections