Papers › Convergence of Anisotropic Consensus-Based Optimization in Mean-Field Law
Convergence of Anisotropic Consensus-Based Optimization in Mean-Field Law
Massimo Fornasier, Timo Klock, Konstantin Riedl
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In this paper we study anisotropic consensus-based optimization (CBO), a multi-agent metaheuristic derivative-free optimization method capable of globally minimizing nonconvex and nonsmooth functions in high dimensions. CBO is based on stochastic swarm intelligence, and inspired by consensus dynamics and opinion formation. Compared to other metaheuristic algorithms like particle swarm optimization, CBO is of a simpler nature and therefore more amenable to theoretical analysis. By adapting a recently established proof technique, we show that anisotropic CBO converges globally with a dimension-independent rate for a rich class of objective functions under minimal assumptions on the initialization of the method. Moreover, the proof technique reveals that CBO performs a convexification of the optimization problem as the number of agents goes to infinity, thus providing an insight into the internal CBO mechanisms responsible for the success of the method. To motivate anisotropic CBO from a practical perspective, we further test the method on a complicated high-dimensional benchmark problem, which is well understood in the machine learning literature.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections