Papers › Contrastive Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learning
Contrastive Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learning
Doyup Lee, Sungwoong Kim, Ildoo Kim, Yeongjae Cheon, Minsu Cho, Wook-Shin Han
Consistency regularization on label predictions becomes a fundamental technique in semi-supervised learning, but it still requires a large number of training iterations for high performance. In this study, we analyze that the consistency regularization restricts the propagation of labeling information due to the exclusion of samples with unconfident pseudo-labels in the model updates. Then, we propose contrastive regularization to improve both efficiency and accuracy of the consistency regularization by well-clustered features of unlabeled data. In specific, after strongly augmented samples are assigned to clusters by their pseudo-labels, our contrastive regularization updates the model so that the features with confident pseudo-labels aggregate the features in the same cluster, while pushing away features in different clusters. As a result, the information of confident pseudo-labels can be effectively propagated into more unlabeled samples during training by the well-clustered features. On benchmarks of semi-supervised learning tasks, our contrastive regularization improves the previous consistency-based methods and achieves state-of-the-art results, especially with fewer training iterations. Our method also shows robust performance on open-set semi-supervised learning where unlabeled data includes out-of-distribution samples.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 250 Labels | FixMatch+CR | Percentage error | 5.04 | #15 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 40 Labels | FixMatch+CR | Percentage error | 5.69 | #9 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels | FixMatch+CR | Percentage error | 4.16 | #13 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 2500 Labels | FixMatch+CR | Percentage error | 27.58 | #15 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 400 Labels | FixMatch+CR | Percentage error | 49.23 | #20 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | cifar-100, 10000 Labels | FixMatch+CR | Percentage error | 21.03 | #6 of 29 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections