Papers › Contrastive Losses Are Natural Criteria for Unsupervised Video Summarization
Contrastive Losses Are Natural Criteria for Unsupervised Video Summarization
Zongshang Pang, Yuta Nakashima, Mayu Otani, Hajime Nagahara
Video summarization aims to select the most informative subset of frames in a video to facilitate efficient video browsing. Unsupervised methods usually rely on heuristic training objectives such as diversity and representativeness. However, such methods need to bootstrap the online-generated summaries to compute the objectives for importance score regression. We consider such a pipeline inefficient and seek to directly quantify the frame-level importance with the help of contrastive losses in the representation learning literature. Leveraging the contrastive losses, we propose three metrics featuring a desirable key frame: local dissimilarity, global consistency, and uniqueness. With features pre-trained on the image classification task, the metrics can already yield high-quality importance scores, demonstrating competitive or better performance than past heavily-trained methods. We show that by refining the pre-trained features with a lightweight contrastively learned projection module, the frame-level importance scores can be further improved, and the model can also leverage a large number of random videos and generalize to test videos with decent performance. Code available at https://github.com/pangzss/pytorch-CTVSUM.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections