Papers › Contrastive Learning for Multi-Modal Automatic Code Review

Contrastive Learning for Multi-Modal Automatic Code Review

28 May 2022arXiv:2205.14289links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Bingting Wu, Xiaofang Zhang

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Automatic code review (ACR), aiming to relieve manual inspection costs, is an indispensable and essential task in software engineering. The existing works only use the source code fragments to predict the results, missing the exploitation of developer's comments. Thus, we present a Multi-Modal Apache Automatic Code Review dataset (MACR) for the Multi-Modal ACR task. The release of this dataset would push forward the research in this field. Based on it, we propose a Contrastive Learning based Multi-Modal Network (CLMN) to deal with the Multi-Modal ACR task. Concretely, our model consists of a code encoding module and a text encoding module. For each module, we use the dropout operation as minimal data augmentation. Then, the contrastive learning method is adopted to pre-train the module parameters. Finally, we combine the two encoders to fine-tune the CLMN to decide the results of Multi-Modal ACR. Experimental results on the MACR dataset illustrate that our proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.

PaperPDFCode

Code

simast-gcn/clmn officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections