Papers › Contrastive Explanations in Neural Networks

Contrastive Explanations in Neural Networks

1 Aug 2020arXiv:2008.00178archive 2025-07-28

Mohit Prabhushankar, Gukyeong Kwon, Dogancan Temel, Ghassan AlRegib

Visual explanations are logical arguments based on visual features that justify the predictions made by neural networks. Current modes of visual explanations answer questions of the form `Why P?′. These Why questions operate under broad contexts thereby providing answers that are irrelevant in some cases. We propose to constrain these Why questions based on some context Q so that our explanations answer contrastive questions of the form `Why P, rather than Q?′. In this paper, we formalize the structure of contrastive visual explanations for neural networks. We define contrast based on neural networks and propose a methodology to extract defined contrasts. We then use the extracted contrasts as a plug-in on top of existing `Why P?′ techniques, specifically Grad-CAM. We demonstrate their value in analyzing both networks and data in applications of large-scale recognition, fine-grained recognition, subsurface seismic analysis, and image quality assessment.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

olivesgatech/Contrastive-Explanations officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
olivesgatech/explanatory-paradigms mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
olivesgatech/introspective-learning mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Image Quality Assessment

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections