Papers › Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptation

Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptation

25 Mar 2022CVPR 2022 1arXiv:2203.13591archive 2025-07-28

Qin Wang, Olga Fink, Luc van Gool, Dengxin Dai

Test-time domain adaptation aims to adapt a source pre-trained model to a target domain without using any source data. Existing works mainly consider the case where the target domain is static. However, real-world machine perception systems are running in non-stationary and continually changing environments where the target domain distribution can change over time. Existing methods, which are mostly based on self-training and entropy regularization, can suffer from these non-stationary environments. Due to the distribution shift over time in the target domain, pseudo-labels become unreliable. The noisy pseudo-labels can further lead to error accumulation and catastrophic forgetting. To tackle these issues, we propose a continual test-time adaptation approach~(CoTTA) which comprises two parts. Firstly, we propose to reduce the error accumulation by using weight-averaged and augmentation-averaged predictions which are often more accurate. On the other hand, to avoid catastrophic forgetting, we propose to stochastically restore a small part of the neurons to the source pre-trained weights during each iteration to help preserve source knowledge in the long-term. The proposed method enables the long-term adaptation for all parameters in the network. CoTTA is easy to implement and can be readily incorporated in off-the-shelf pre-trained models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on four classification tasks and a segmentation task for continual test-time adaptation, on which we outperform existing methods. Our code is available at \url{https://qin.ee/cotta}.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2203.13591")

Code

Syntology Ran 6 of 11 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran · fixture could not drive it; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran; community (archive-listed): 7 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

qinenergy/cotta officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report
mariodoebler/test-time-adaptation mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
3ran · fixture could not drive it
2ran
5unverified

Licence: 4 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

ColorJitterPro qinenergy/cotta/imagenet/cotta.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: invariant licence not identified · pointer only · b489338bf0c5151a · report
softmax_entropy qinenergy/cotta/imagenet/cotta.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it licence not identified · pointer only · 867d3ea552eca91a · report
CoTTA qinenergy/cotta/imagenet/cotta.py official repository unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 37f58a96f8a7fef2 · report
get_tta_transforms qinenergy/cotta/imagenet/cotta.py official repository unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 3e1ce9963cc81750 · report
ColorJitterPro gist-ailab/domain-specific-block-selection-and-paired-view-pseudo-labeling-for-online-tta/classification/methods/cotta.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · a9926aa9bf223a28 · report
get_tta_transforms gist-ailab/domain-specific-block-selection-and-paired-view-pseudo-labeling-for-online-tta/classification/methods/cotta.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · a8e9d937548d1d57 · report
softmax_entropy_cifar gist-ailab/domain-specific-block-selection-and-paired-view-pseudo-labeling-for-online-tta/classification/methods/cotta.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it MIT (permissive) · 0468f0b50e09906c · report
softmax_entropy_imagenet gist-ailab/domain-specific-block-selection-and-paired-view-pseudo-labeling-for-online-tta/classification/methods/cotta.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it MIT (permissive) · 1fc83fb4edd6a960 · report
CoTTA gist-ailab/domain-specific-block-selection-and-paired-view-pseudo-labeling-for-online-tta/classification/methods/cotta.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 075386119a24268c · report
ResNetDomainNet126 gist-ailab/domain-specific-block-selection-and-paired-view-pseudo-labeling-for-online-tta/classification/methods/cotta.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 83761eb5f1fb5613 · report
TTAMethod gist-ailab/domain-specific-block-selection-and-paired-view-pseudo-labeling-for-online-tta/classification/methods/cotta.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 77fa9f7bf81480f2 · report

Tasks

Domain AdaptationTest-time Adaptation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections