Papers › Contextual Bandits with Stochastic Experts

Contextual Bandits with Stochastic Experts

23 Feb 2018arXiv:1802.08737archive 2025-07-28

Rajat Sen, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Nihal Sharma, Sanjay Shakkottai

We consider the problem of contextual bandits with stochastic experts, which is a variation of the traditional stochastic contextual bandit with experts problem. In our problem setting, we assume access to a class of stochastic experts, where each expert is a conditional distribution over the arms given a context. We propose upper-confidence bound (UCB) algorithms for this problem, which employ two different importance sampling based estimators for the mean reward for each expert. Both these estimators leverage information leakage among the experts, thus using samples collected under all the experts to estimate the mean reward of any given expert. This leads to instance dependent regret bounds of 𝒪(λ(μ)ℳlogT/Δ), where λ(μ) is a term that depends on the mean rewards of the experts, Δ is the smallest gap between the mean reward of the optimal expert and the rest, and ℳ quantifies the information leakage among the experts. We show that under some assumptions λ(μ) is typically 𝒪(logN), where N is the number of experts. We implement our algorithm with stochastic experts generated from cost-sensitive classification oracles and show superior empirical performance on real-world datasets, when compared to other state of the art contextual bandit algorithms.

PaperPDFCode

Code

rajatsen91/CB_StochasticExperts officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Multi-Armed Bandits

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections