Papers › Content-based Video Relevance Prediction Challenge: Data, Protocol, and Baseline

Content-based Video Relevance Prediction Challenge: Data, Protocol, and Baseline

3 Jun 2018arXiv:1806.00737archive 2025-07-28

Mengyi Liu, Xiaohui Xie, Hanning Zhou

Video relevance prediction is one of the most important tasks for online streaming service. Given the relevance of videos and viewer feedbacks, the system can provide personalized recommendations, which will help the user discover more content of interest. In most online service, the computation of video relevance table is based on users' implicit feedback, e.g. watch and search history. However, this kind of method performs poorly for "cold-start" problems - when a new video is added to the library, the recommendation system needs to bootstrap the video relevance score with very little user behavior known. One promising approach to solve it is analyzing video content itself, i.e. predicting video relevance by video frame, audio, subtitle and metadata. In this paper, we describe a challenge on Content-based Video Relevance Prediction (CBVRP) that is hosted by Hulu in the ACM Multimedia Conference 2018. In this challenge, Hulu drives the study on an open problem of exploiting content characteristics directly from original video for video relevance prediction. We provide massive video assets and ground truth relevance derived from our really system, to build up a common platform for algorithm development and performance evaluation.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mengyi-liu/cbvrp-acmmm-2018 officialmentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Prediction

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections