Papers › Content-Aware Detection of Temporal Metadata Manipulation
Content-Aware Detection of Temporal Metadata Manipulation
Rafael Padilha, Tawfiq Salem, Scott Workman, Fernanda A. Andaló, Anderson Rocha, Nathan Jacobs
Most pictures shared online are accompanied by temporal metadata (i.e., the day and time they were taken), which makes it possible to associate an image content with real-world events. Maliciously manipulating this metadata can convey a distorted version of reality. In this work, we present the emerging problem of detecting timestamp manipulation. We propose an end-to-end approach to verify whether the purported time of capture of an outdoor image is consistent with its content and geographic location. We consider manipulations done in the hour and/or month of capture of a photograph. The central idea is the use of supervised consistency verification, in which we predict the probability that the image content, capture time, and geographical location are consistent. We also include a pair of auxiliary tasks, which can be used to explain the network decision. Our approach improves upon previous work on a large benchmark dataset, increasing the classification accuracy from 59.0% to 81.1%. We perform an ablation study that highlights the importance of various components of the method, showing what types of tampering are detectable using our approach. Finally, we demonstrate how the proposed method can be employed to estimate a possible time-of-capture in scenarios in which the timestamp is missing from the metadata.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporal Metadata Manipulation Detection | Cross-View Time Dataset | DenseNet-121 - G, t, l, S (TA) | 2-Class Accuracy | 81.1 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Temporal Metadata Manipulation Detection | Cross-View Time Dataset | DenseNet-121 - G, t, l, S (TA) | AUC | 0.885 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Temporal Metadata Manipulation Detection | Cross-View Time Dataset (Cross-Camera Split) | DenseNet-121 - G, t, l, S (TA) | 2-Class Accuracy | 67.9 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Temporal Metadata Manipulation Detection | Cross-View Time Dataset (Cross-Camera Split) | DenseNet-121 - G, t, l, S (TA) | AUC | 0.749 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections