Papers › Constrained Optimal Querying: Huffman Coding and Beyond
Constrained Optimal Querying: Huffman Coding and Beyond
Shuyuan Zhang, Jichen Sun, Shengkang Chen
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Huffman coding is well known to be useful in certain decision problems involving minimizing the average number of (freely chosen) queries to determine an unknown random variable. However, in problems where the queries are more constrained, the original Huffman coding no longer works. In this paper, we proposed a general model to describe such problems and two code schemes: one is Huffman-based, and the other called GBSC (Greedy Binary Separation Coding). We proved the optimality of GBSC by induction on a binary decision tree, telling us that GBSC is at least as good as Shannon coding. We then compared the two algorithms based on these two codes, by testing them with two problems: DNA detection and 1-player Battleship, and found both to be decent approximating algorithms, with Huffman-based algorithm giving an expected length 1.1 times the true optimal in DNA detection problem, and GBSC yielding an average number of queries 1.4 times the theoretical optimal in 1-player Battleship.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections