Papers › Conservative Time Discretization: A Comparative Study

Conservative Time Discretization: A Comparative Study

2 Nov 2021arXiv:2111.01454links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Marcelo Forets, Christian Schilling

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We present the first review of methods to overapproximate the set of reachable states of linear time-invariant systems subject to uncertain initial states and input signals for short time horizons. These methods are fundamental to state-of-the-art reachability algorithms for long time horizons, which proceed in two steps: First they use such a method to discretize the system for a short time horizon, and then they efficiently obtain a solution of the new discrete system for the long time horizon. Traditionally, both qualitative and quantitative comparison between different reachability algorithms has only considered the combination of both steps. In this paper we study the first step in isolation. We perform a variety of numerical experiments for six fundamental discretization methods from the literature. As we show, these methods have different trade-offs regarding accuracy and computational cost and, depending on the characteristics of the system, some methods may be preferred over others. We also discuss preprocessing steps to improve the results and efficient implementation strategies.

PaperPDFCode

Code

JuliaReach/LazySets.jl officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubNOASSERTION report
juliareach/ifm22_re officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections