Papers › Consensus on Lie groups for the Riemannian Center of Mass

Consensus on Lie groups for the Riemannian Center of Mass

15 Aug 2023arXiv:2308.08054links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Spencer Kraisler, Shahriar Talebi, Mehran Mesbahi

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

In this paper, we develop a consensus algorithm for distributed computation of the Riemannian center of mass (RCM) on Lie Groups. The algorithm is built upon a distributed optimization reformulation that allows developing an intrinsic, distributed (without relying on a consensus subroutine), and a computationally efficient protocol for the RCM computation. The novel idea for developing this fast distributed algorithm is to utilize a Riemannian version of distributed gradient flow combined with a gradient tracking technique. We first guarantee that, under certain conditions, the limit point of our algorithm is the RCM point of interest. We then provide a proof of global convergence in the Euclidean setting, that can be viewed as a "geometric" dynamic consensus that converges to the average from arbitrary initial points. Finally, we proceed to showcase the superior convergence properties of the proposed approach as compared with other classes of consensus optimization-based algorithms for the RCM computation.

PaperPDFCode

Code

spencerkraisler/rcm-consensus-lie-group officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections