Papers › Conditional Extreme Value Theory for Open Set Video Domain Adaptation

Conditional Extreme Value Theory for Open Set Video Domain Adaptation

1 Sep 2021arXiv:2109.00522archive 2025-07-28

Zhuoxiao Chen, Yadan Luo, Mahsa Baktashmotlagh

With the advent of media streaming, video action recognition has become progressively important for various applications, yet at the high expense of requiring large-scale data labelling. To overcome the problem of expensive data labelling, domain adaptation techniques have been proposed that transfers knowledge from fully labelled data (i.e., source domain) to unlabelled data (i.e., target domain). The majority of video domain adaptation algorithms are proposed for closed-set scenarios in which all the classes are shared among the domains. In this work, we propose an open-set video domain adaptation approach to mitigate the domain discrepancy between the source and target data, allowing the target data to contain additional classes that do not belong to the source domain. Different from previous works, which only focus on improving accuracy for shared classes, we aim to jointly enhance the alignment of shared classes and recognition of unknown samples. Towards this goal, class-conditional extreme value theory is applied to enhance the unknown recognition. Specifically, the entropy values of target samples are modelled as generalised extreme value distributions, which allows separating unknown samples lying in the tail of the distribution. To alleviate the negative transfer issue, weights computed by the distance from the sample entropy to the threshold are leveraged in adversarial learning in the sense that confident source and target samples are aligned, and unconfident samples are pushed away. The proposed method has been thoroughly evaluated on both small-scale and large-scale cross-domain video datasets and achieved the state-of-the-art performance.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from zhuoxiao-chen/cevt. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections