Papers › Computational Higher Type Theory IV: Inductive Types

Computational Higher Type Theory IV: Inductive Types

4 Jan 2018arXiv:1801.01568links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Evan Cavallo, Robert Harper

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

This is the fourth in a series of papers extending Martin-L\"of's meaning explanation of dependent type theory to higher-dimensional types. In this installment, we show how to define cubical type systems supporting a general schema of indexed cubical inductive types whose constructors may take dimension parameters and have a specified boundary. Using this schema, we are able to specify and implement many of the higher inductive types which have been postulated in homotopy type theory, including homotopy pushouts, the torus, W-quotients, truncations, arbitrary localizations. By including indexed inductive types, we enable the definition of identity types. The addition of higher inductive types makes computational higher type theory a model of homotopy type theory, capable of interpreting almost all of the constructions in the HoTT Book (with the exception of inductive-inductive types). This is the first such model with an explicit canonicity theorem, which specifies the canonical values of higher inductive types and confirms that every term in an inductive type evaluates to such a value.

PaperPDFCode

Code

RedPRL/redtt mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections