Papers › Compositional Languages Emerge in a Neural Iterated Learning Model

Compositional Languages Emerge in a Neural Iterated Learning Model

4 Feb 2020ICLR 2020 1arXiv:2002.01365archive 2025-07-28

Yi Ren, Shangmin Guo, Matthieu Labeau, Shay B. Cohen, Simon Kirby

The principle of compositionality, which enables natural language to represent complex concepts via a structured combination of simpler ones, allows us to convey an open-ended set of messages using a limited vocabulary. If compositionality is indeed a natural property of language, we may expect it to appear in communication protocols that are created by neural agents in language games. In this paper, we propose an effective neural iterated learning (NIL) algorithm that, when applied to interacting neural agents, facilitates the emergence of a more structured type of language. Indeed, these languages provide learning speed advantages to neural agents during training, which can be incrementally amplified via NIL. We provide a probabilistic model of NIL and an explanation of why the advantage of compositional language exist. Our experiments confirm our analysis, and also demonstrate that the emerged languages largely improve the generalizing power of the neural agent communication.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2002.01365")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 9 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 9 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning officialmentioned in paperpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

9unverified

Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

cat_softmax Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/models/model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 54d2d2202334e3b0 · report
edit_dist Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/utils/result_record.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 618f6c2d8b6a4b33 · report
get_lis_curve_msg Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/utils/manual_language_gen.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 06863a600040ac40 · report
hanmming_dist Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/utils/result_record.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 330aa6cf303d25f9 · report
key_to_value Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/utils/manual_language_gen.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 507445982b6df2d6 · report
num_compositional Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/utils/__language_types.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 82dba4ec6b8597c4 · report
num_holi_comp Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/utils/__language_types.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · bde7360c494fa179 · report
valid_list_gen Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/utils/data_gen.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 5c008778ef447369 · report
value_to_onehot Joshua-Ren/Neural_Iterated_Learning/utils/manual_language_gen.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · bd2406d53ad12686 · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SPEED

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections