Papers › Comparison of Step Samplers for Nested Sampling
Comparison of Step Samplers for Nested Sampling
Johannes Buchner
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Bayesian inference with nested sampling requires a likelihood-restricted prior sampling method, which draws samples from the prior distribution that exceed a likelihood threshold. For high-dimensional problems, Markov Chain Monte Carlo derivatives have been proposed. We numerically study ten algorithms based on slice sampling, hit-and-run and differential evolution algorithms in ellipsoidal, non-ellipsoidal and non-convex problems from 2 to 100 dimensions. Mixing capabilities are evaluated with the nested sampling shrinkage test. This makes our results valid independent of how heavy-tailed the posteriors are. Given the same number of steps, slice sampling is outperformed by hit-and-run and whitened slice sampling, while whitened hit-and-run does not provide as good results. Proposing along differential vectors of live point pairs also leads to the highest efficiencies, and appears promising for multi-modal problems. The tested proposals are implemented in the UltraNest nested sampling package, enabling efficient low and high-dimensional inference of a large class of practical inference problems relevant to astronomy, cosmology, particle physics and astronomy.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections