Papers › Comparison of single image HDR reconstruction methods — the caveats of quality assessment

Comparison of single image HDR reconstruction methods — the caveats of quality assessment

24 Jul 2022ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Proceedings 2022 7archive 2025-07-28

Param Hanji, Rafał K. Mantiuk, Gabriel Eilertsen, Saghi Hajisharif, Jonas Unger

As the problem of reconstructing high dynamic range (HDR) images from a single exposure has attracted much research effort, it is essential to provide a robust protocol and clear guidelines on how to evaluate and compare new methods. In this work, we compared six recent single image HDR reconstruction (SI-HDR) methods in a subjective image quality experiment on an HDR display. We found that only two methods produced results that are, on average, more preferred than the unprocessed single exposure images. When the same methods are evaluated using image quality metrics, as typically done in papers, the metric predictions correlate poorly with subjective quality scores. The main reason is a significant tone and color difference between the reference and reconstructed HDR images. To improve the predictions of image quality metrics, we propose correcting for the inaccuracies of the estimated camera response curve before computing quality values. We further analyze, the sources of prediction noise when evaluating SI-HDR methods and demonstrate that existing metrics can reliably predict only large quality differences.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

HDR Reconstruction

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

SI-HDR

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections