Papers › Communication-Efficient Graph Neural Networks with Probabilistic Neighborhood...

Communication-Efficient Graph Neural Networks with Probabilistic Neighborhood Expansion Analysis and Caching

4 May 2023arXiv:2305.03152archive 2025-07-28

Tim Kaler, Alexandros-Stavros Iliopoulos, Philip Murzynowski, Tao B. Schardl, Charles E. Leiserson, Jie Chen

Training and inference with graph neural networks (GNNs) on massive graphs has been actively studied since the inception of GNNs, owing to the widespread use and success of GNNs in applications such as recommendation systems and financial forensics. This paper is concerned with minibatch training and inference with GNNs that employ node-wise sampling in distributed settings, where the necessary partitioning of vertex features across distributed storage causes feature communication to become a major bottleneck that hampers scalability. To significantly reduce the communication volume without compromising prediction accuracy, we propose a policy for caching data associated with frequently accessed vertices in remote partitions. The proposed policy is based on an analysis of vertex-wise inclusion probabilities (VIP) during multi-hop neighborhood sampling, which may expand the neighborhood far beyond the partition boundaries of the graph. VIP analysis not only enables the elimination of the communication bottleneck, but it also offers a means to organize in-memory data by prioritizing GPU storage for the most frequently accessed vertex features. We present SALIENT++, which extends the prior state-of-the-art SALIENT system to work with partitioned feature data and leverages the VIP-driven caching policy. SALIENT++ retains the local training efficiency and scalability of SALIENT by using a deep pipeline and drastically reducing communication volume while consuming only a fraction of the storage required by SALIENT. We provide experimental results with the Open Graph Benchmark data sets and demonstrate that training a 3-layer GraphSAGE model with SALIENT++ on 8 single-GPU machines is 7.1 faster than with SALIENT on 1 single-GPU machine, and 12.7 faster than with DistDGL on 8 single-GPU machines.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mitibmxgraph/salient_plusplus officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
mitibmxgraph/salient_plusplus_artifact officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Recommendation Systems

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

DistDGLGraphSAGE

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections