Papers › ComboLoss for Facial Attractiveness Analysis with Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks

ComboLoss for Facial Attractiveness Analysis with Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks

21 Oct 2020arXiv:2010.10721links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Lu Xu, Jinhai Xiang

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Loss function is crucial for model training and feature representation learning, conventional models usually regard facial attractiveness recognition task as a regression problem, and adopt MSE loss or Huber variant loss as supervision to train a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict facial attractiveness score. Little work has been done to systematically compare the performance of diverse loss functions. In this paper, we firstly systematically analyze model performance under diverse loss functions. Then a novel loss function named ComboLoss is proposed to guide the SEResNeXt50 network. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on SCUT-FBP, HotOrNot and SCUT-FBP5500 datasets with an improvement of 1.13%, 2.1% and 0.57% compared with prior arts, respectively. Code and models are available at https://github.com/lucasxlu/ComboLoss.git.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

lucasxlu/ComboLoss officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections