Papers › Combinatorial Bandits under Strategic Manipulations

Combinatorial Bandits under Strategic Manipulations

25 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.12722archive 2025-07-28

Jing Dong, Ke Li, Shuai Li, Baoxiang Wang

Strategic behavior against sequential learning methods, such as "click framing" in real recommendation systems, have been widely observed. Motivated by such behavior we study the problem of combinatorial multi-armed bandits (CMAB) under strategic manipulations of rewards, where each arm can modify the emitted reward signals for its own interest. This characterization of the adversarial behavior is a relaxation of previously well-studied settings such as adversarial attacks and adversarial corruption. We propose a strategic variant of the combinatorial UCB algorithm, which has a regret of at most O(mlogT + m Bₘₐₓ) under strategic manipulations, where T is the time horizon, m is the number of arms, and Bₘₐₓ is the maximum budget of an arm. We provide lower bounds on the budget for arms to incur certain regret of the bandit algorithm. Extensive experiments on online worker selection for crowdsourcing systems, online influence maximization and online recommendations with both synthetic and real datasets corroborate our theoretical findings on robustness and regret bounds, in a variety of regimes of manipulation budgets.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

shirleydongj/StrategicCUCB officialmentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Multi-Armed BanditsRecommendation Systems

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections