Papers › COEGAN: Evaluating the Coevolution Effect in Generative Adversarial Networks

COEGAN: Evaluating the Coevolution Effect in Generative Adversarial Networks

12 Dec 2019arXiv:1912.06180archive 2025-07-28

Victor Costa, Nuno Lourenço, João Correia, Penousal Machado

Generative adversarial networks (GAN) present state-of-the-art results in the generation of samples following the distribution of the input dataset. However, GANs are difficult to train, and several aspects of the model should be previously designed by hand. Neuroevolution is a well-known technique used to provide the automatic design of network architectures which was recently expanded to deep neural networks. COEGAN is a model that uses neuroevolution and coevolution in the GAN training algorithm to provide a more stable training method and the automatic design of neural network architectures. COEGAN makes use of the adversarial aspect of the GAN components to implement coevolutionary strategies in the training algorithm. Our proposal was evaluated in the Fashion-MNIST and MNIST dataset. We compare our results with a baseline based on DCGAN and also with results from a random search algorithm. We show that our method is able to discover efficient architectures in the Fashion-MNIST and MNIST datasets. The results also suggest that COEGAN can be used as a training algorithm for GANs to avoid common issues, such as the mode collapse problem.

PaperPDFCode

Code

vfcosta/coegan officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Batch NormalizationConvolutionDCGANRandom SearchReLU

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections