Papers › CodeS: Towards Code Model Generalization Under Distribution Shift

CodeS: Towards Code Model Generalization Under Distribution Shift

11 Jun 2022arXiv:2206.05480archive 2025-07-28

Qiang Hu, Yuejun Guo, Xiaofei Xie, Maxime Cordy, Lei Ma, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon

Distribution shift has been a longstanding challenge for the reliable deployment of deep learning (DL) models due to unexpected accuracy degradation. Although DL has been becoming a driving force for large-scale source code analysis in the big code era, limited progress has been made on distribution shift analysis and benchmarking for source code tasks. To fill this gap, this paper initiates to propose CodeS, a distribution shift benchmark dataset, for source code learning. Specifically, CodeS supports two programming languages (Java and Python) and five shift types (task, programmer, time-stamp, token, and concrete syntax tree). Extensive experiments based on CodeS reveal that 1) out-of-distribution detectors from other domains (e.g., computer vision) do not generalize to source code, 2) all code classification models suffer from distribution shifts, 3) representation-based shifts have a higher impact on the model than others, and 4) pre-trained bimodal models are relatively more resistant to distribution shifts.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

testing-cs/codes officialmentioned in papertf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BenchmarkingCode Classificationmodel

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Softmax

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections