Papers › Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Baptiste Rozière, Jonas Gehring, Fabian Gloeckle, Sten Sootla, Itai Gat, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Yossi Adi, Jingyu Liu, Romain Sauvestre, Tal Remez, Jérémy Rapin, Artyom Kozhevnikov, Ivan Evtimov, Joanna Bitton, Manish Bhatt, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Aaron Grattafiori, Wenhan Xiong, Alexandre Défossez, Jade Copet, Faisal Azhar, Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Nicolas Usunier, Thomas Scialom, Gabriel Synnaeve
We release Code Llama, a family of large language models for code based on Llama 2 providing state-of-the-art performance among open models, infilling capabilities, support for large input contexts, and zero-shot instruction following ability for programming tasks. We provide multiple flavors to cover a wide range of applications: foundation models (Code Llama), Python specializations (Code Llama - Python), and instruction-following models (Code Llama - Instruct) with 7B, 13B, 34B and 70B parameters each. All models are trained on sequences of 16k tokens and show improvements on inputs with up to 100k tokens. 7B, 13B and 70B Code Llama and Code Llama - Instruct variants support infilling based on surrounding content. Code Llama reaches state-of-the-art performance among open models on several code benchmarks, with scores of up to 67% and 65% on HumanEval and MBPP, respectively. Notably, Code Llama - Python 7B outperforms Llama 2 70B on HumanEval and MBPP, and all our models outperform every other publicly available model on MultiPL-E. We release Code Llama under a permissive license that allows for both research and commercial use.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2308.12950")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 5 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
5 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 4 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e93cc5b705c2eb3b · report
70bf6ebaafd266c4 · report
8845976729f4c4ee · report
ed8b68645cfd07e0 · report
eaff610771ed93b5 · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama - Python 70B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 65.5 | #40 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama 70B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 62.4 | #43 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama - Instruct 70B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 62.2 | #44 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Unnatural Code Llama 34B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 61.2 | #47 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama - Instruct 34B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 57 | #51 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama - Python 34B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 56.2 | #52 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama 34B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 55 | #54 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | GPT-3.5 Turbo | Accuracy | 52.2 | #57 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama - Instruct 13B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 49.4 | #61 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama - Python 13B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 49 | #64 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama - Python 7B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 47.6 | #67 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama 13B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 47 | #72 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama - Instruct 7B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 44.4 | #77 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Code Llama 7B (3-shot) | Accuracy | 41.4 | #81 of 99 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections