Papers › Coarse-to-Fine Contrastive Learning in Image-Text-Graph Space for Improved...
Coarse-to-Fine Contrastive Learning in Image-Text-Graph Space for Improved Vision-Language Compositionality
23 May 2023arXiv:2305.13812archive 2025-07-28
Harman Singh, Pengchuan Zhang, Qifan Wang, Mengjiao Wang, Wenhan Xiong, Jingfei Du, Yu Chen
Contrastively trained vision-language models have achieved remarkable progress in vision and language representation learning, leading to state-of-the-art models for various downstream multimodal tasks. However, recent research has highlighted severe limitations of these models in their ability to perform compositional reasoning over objects, attributes, and relations. Scene graphs have emerged as an effective way to understand images compositionally. These are graph-structured semantic representations of images that contain objects, their attributes, and relations with other objects in a scene. In this work, we consider the scene graph parsed from text as a proxy for the image scene graph and propose a graph decomposition and augmentation framework along with a coarse-to-fine contrastive learning objective between images and text that aligns sentences of various complexities to the same image. Along with this, we propose novel negative mining techniques in the scene graph space for improving attribute binding and relation understanding. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach that significantly improves attribute binding, relation understanding, systematic generalization, and productivity on multiple recently proposed benchmarks (For example, improvements upto 18% for systematic generalization, 16.5% for relation understanding over a strong baseline), while achieving similar or better performance than CLIP on various general multimodal tasks.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
Swin-T (MosaiCLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
44.5 |
#9 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
Swin-T (MosaiCLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
92.1 |
#9 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
RN-50 (MosaiCLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
44.4 |
#10 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
RN-50 (MosaiCLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
92.6 |
#10 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
MosaiCLIP (YFCC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
41.5 |
#11 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
MosaiCLIP (YFCC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
48.8 |
#11 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
RN-50 (NegCLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
41.4 |
#12 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
RN-50 (NegCLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
82.0 |
#12 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
MosaiCLIP (CC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
40.9 |
#13 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
MosaiCLIP (CC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
72.4 |
#13 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
Swin-T (NegCLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
39.6 |
#14 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
Swin-T (NegCLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
80.3 |
#14 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
CLIP (YFCC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
39.5 |
#15 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
CLIP (YFCC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
39.8 |
#15 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
NegCLIP (YFCC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
39.0 |
#16 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
NegCLIP (YFCC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
38.8 |
#16 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
CLIP-FT (YFCC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
38.3 |
#17 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
CLIP-FT (YFCC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
36.4 |
#17 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
NegCLIP (CC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
37.5 |
#18 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
NegCLIP (CC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
53.1 |
#18 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
Swin-T (CLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
37.3 |
#19 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
Swin-T (CLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
44.1 |
#19 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
RN-50 (CLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
36.7 |
#20 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
RN-50 (CLIP, CC-12M) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
42.9 |
#20 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
CLIP-FT (CC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
35.6 |
#21 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
CLIP-FT (CC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
45.8 |
#21 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
CLIP (CC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Atom, UC) |
35.0 |
#22 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Image Retrieval |
CREPE (Compositional REPresentation Evaluation) |
CLIP (CC-FT) |
Recall@1 (HN-Comp, UC) |
45.1 |
#22 of 22 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections