Papers › Coarse-to-Fine Attention Models for Document Summarization
Coarse-to-Fine Attention Models for Document Summarization
Jeffrey Ling, Alex Rush, er
Sequence-to-sequence models with attention have been successful for a variety of NLP problems, but their speed does not scale well for tasks with long source sequences such as document summarization. We propose a novel coarse-to-fine attention model that hierarchically reads a document, using coarse attention to select top-level chunks of text and fine attention to read the words of the chosen chunks. While the computation for training standard attention models scales linearly with source sequence length, our method scales with the number of top-level chunks and can handle much longer sequences. Empirically, we find that while coarse-to-fine attention models lag behind state-of-the-art baselines, our method achieves the desired behavior of sparsely attending to subsets of the document for generation.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail | C2F + ALTERNATE | PPL | 23.6 | #25 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Document Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail | C2F + ALTERNATE | ROUGE-1 | 31.1 | #25 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Document Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail | C2F + ALTERNATE | ROUGE-2 | 15.4 | #25 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Document Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail | C2F + ALTERNATE | ROUGE-L | 28.8 | #25 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections