Papers › Co-training 2ᴸ Submodels for Visual Recognition
Co-training 2ᴸ Submodels for Visual Recognition
Hugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Maxime Oquab, Piotr Bojanowski, Jakob Verbeek, Hervé Jégou
We introduce submodel co-training, a regularization method related to co-training, self-distillation and stochastic depth. Given a neural network to be trained, for each sample we implicitly instantiate two altered networks, ``submodels'', with stochastic depth: we activate only a subset of the layers. Each network serves as a soft teacher to the other, by providing a loss that complements the regular loss provided by the one-hot label. Our approach, dubbed cosub, uses a single set of weights, and does not involve a pre-trained external model or temporal averaging. Experimentally, we show that submodel co-training is effective to train backbones for recognition tasks such as image classification and semantic segmentation. Our approach is compatible with multiple architectures, including RegNet, ViT, PiT, XCiT, Swin and ConvNext. Our training strategy improves their results in comparable settings. For instance, a ViT-B pretrained with cosub on ImageNet-21k obtains 87.4% top-1 acc. @448 on ImageNet-val.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ViT-H@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 88.0% | #62 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ViT-L@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 87.5% | #82 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | Swin-L@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 87.1% | #102 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ViT-B@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 86.3% | #155 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | Swin-B@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 86.2% | #165 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ConvNeXt-B@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 85.8% | #189 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | PiT-B@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 85.8% | #190 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ViT-M@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 85.0% | #263 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | RegnetY16GF@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 84.2% | #336 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ViT-S@224 (cosub) | Top 1 Accuracy | 83.1% | #466 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections