Papers › CAT-ViL: Co-Attention Gated Vision-Language Embedding for Visual Question...
CAT-ViL: Co-Attention Gated Vision-Language Embedding for Visual Question Localized-Answering in Robotic Surgery
Long Bai, Mobarakol Islam, Hongliang Ren
Medical students and junior surgeons often rely on senior surgeons and specialists to answer their questions when learning surgery. However, experts are often busy with clinical and academic work, and have little time to give guidance. Meanwhile, existing deep learning (DL)-based surgical Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems can only provide simple answers without the location of the answers. In addition, vision-language (ViL) embedding is still a less explored research in these kinds of tasks. Therefore, a surgical Visual Question Localized-Answering (VQLA) system would be helpful for medical students and junior surgeons to learn and understand from recorded surgical videos. We propose an end-to-end Transformer with the Co-Attention gaTed Vision-Language (CAT-ViL) embedding for VQLA in surgical scenarios, which does not require feature extraction through detection models. The CAT-ViL embedding module is designed to fuse multimodal features from visual and textual sources. The fused embedding will feed a standard Data-Efficient Image Transformer (DeiT) module, before the parallel classifier and detector for joint prediction. We conduct the experimental validation on public surgical videos from MICCAI EndoVis Challenge 2017 and 2018. The experimental results highlight the superior performance and robustness of our proposed model compared to the state-of-the-art approaches. Ablation studies further prove the outstanding performance of all the proposed components. The proposed method provides a promising solution for surgical scene understanding, and opens up a primary step in the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based VQLA system for surgical training. Our code is publicly available.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2307.05182")
Code
Syntology Ran 8 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 7 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 8 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
8 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from longbai1006/cat-vil. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
53daad1d7b99fbdf · report
19988d5d6c4a4d7c · report
9fd07c1d7cd49c46 · report
e21bb85b8e1b4836 · report
e766a0a3063c15d0 · report
cfa4887da544c990 · report
54a2fff601881b32 · report
77586e7080d66922 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections