Papers › CMM-Math: A Chinese Multimodal Math Dataset To Evaluate and Enhance the Mathematics...

CMM-Math: A Chinese Multimodal Math Dataset To Evaluate and Enhance the Mathematics Reasoning of Large Multimodal Models

4 Sep 2024arXiv:2409.02834archive 2025-07-28

Wentao Liu, Qianjun Pan, Yi Zhang, Zhuo Liu, Ji Wu, Jie zhou, Aimin Zhou, Qin Chen, Bo Jiang, Liang He

Large language models (LLMs) have obtained promising results in mathematical reasoning, which is a foundational skill for human intelligence. Most previous studies focus on improving and measuring the performance of LLMs based on textual math reasoning datasets (e.g., MATH, GSM8K). Recently, a few researchers have released English multimodal math datasets (e.g., MATHVISTA and MATH-V) to evaluate the effectiveness of large multimodal models (LMMs). In this paper, we release a Chinese multimodal math (CMM-Math) dataset, including benchmark and training parts, to evaluate and enhance the mathematical reasoning of LMMs. CMM-Math contains over 28,000 high-quality samples, featuring a variety of problem types (e.g., multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blank, and so on) with detailed solutions across 12 grade levels from elementary to high school in China. Specifically, the visual context may be present in the questions or opinions, which makes this dataset more challenging. Through comprehensive analysis, we discover that state-of-the-art LMMs on the CMM-Math dataset face challenges, emphasizing the necessity for further improvements in LMM development. We also propose a Multimodal Mathematical LMM (Math-LMM) to handle the problems with mixed input of multiple images and text segments. We train our model using three stages, including foundational pre-training, foundational fine-tuning, and mathematical fine-tuning. The extensive experiments indicate that our model effectively improves math reasoning performance by comparing it with the SOTA LMMs over three multimodal mathematical datasets.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2409.02834")

Code

Syntology Ran 9 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 7 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ecnu-icalk/educhat-math officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
7ran
2unverified

Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ecnu-icalk/educhat-math. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

find_numbers ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/evaluation/gpt-4o-score_evaluation.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 1b45ec2310c135f1 · report
geninput ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/model/gpt-4o_score.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · be8d4ca39a48c497 · report
geninput ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/model/answer_in_testdata/GPT4o-shot.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · d9f0af10bb7e9abf · report
get_number ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/model/answer_in_testdata/Gemini-shot.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 0f8b935a80bb2968 · report
get_score ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/evaluation/gpt-4o-score_evaluation.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · ac28ae0c3a3f6b14 · report
is_number ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/evaluation/utils.py official repository ran · violated contract no licence file found · pointer only · e18607dae38b30e2 · report
load_jsonl ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/evaluation/gpt-4o-score_evaluation.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 17081a7b73a41850 · report
load_jsonl ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/model/gpt-4o_score.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 5d1668ea8bfb652f · report
load_jsonl ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/model/answer_in_testdata/Gemini-shot.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 8bcc3df886c26873 · report
encode_image ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/model/answer_in_testdata/GPT4o-shot.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · a7b8d145010c3bfa · report
encode_image ecnu-icalk/educhat-math/model/answer_in_testdata/GPT4o.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · dcdb5c80a7b5cffa · report

Tasks

GSM8KMathMathematical ReasoningMultiple-choice

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Focus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections