Papers › Cloud properties across spatial scales in simulations of the interstellar medium

Cloud properties across spatial scales in simulations of the interstellar medium

1 Mar 2024arXiv:2403.00512links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Tine Colman, Noé Brucy, Philipp Girichidis, Simon C. O Glover, Milena Benedettini, Juan D. Soler, Robin G. Tress, Alessio Traficante, Patrick Hennebelle, Ralf S. Klessen, Sergio Molinari, Marc-Antoine Miville-Deschênes

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Molecular clouds (MC) are structures of dense gas in the interstellar medium (ISM), that extend from ten to a few hundred parsecs and form the main gas reservoir available for star formation. Hydrodynamical simulations of varying complexity are a promising way to investigate MC evolution and their properties. However, each simulation typically has a limited range in resolution and different cloud extraction algorithms are used, which complicates the comparison between simulations. In this work, we aim to extract clouds from different simulations covering a wide range of spatial scales. We compare their properties, such as size, shape, mass, internal velocity dispersion and virial state. We apply the Hop cloud detection algorithm on (M)HD numerical simulations of stratified ISM boxes and isolated galactic disk simulations that were produced using Flash Ramses and Arepo We find that the extracted clouds are complex in shape ranging from round objects to complex filamentary networks in all setups. Despite the wide range of scales, resolution, and sub-grid physics, we observe surprisingly robust trends in the investigated metrics. The mass spectrum matches in the overlap between simulations without rescaling and with a high-mass slope of d N/dlnM∝-1 in accordance with theoretical predictions. The internal velocity dispersion scales with the size of the cloud as σ∝R^(0.75) for large clouds (R≳3 pc). For small clouds we find larger sigma compared to the power-law scaling, as seen in observations, which is due to supernova-driven turbulence. Almost all clouds are gravitationally unbound with the virial parameter scaling as αᵥᵢᵣ∝M^(-0.4), which is slightly flatter compared to observed scaling, but in agreement given the large scatter.

PaperPDFCode

Code

gitlab.com/tinecolman/ecogal_tools officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections