Papers › Closing a Source Complexity Gap between Chapel and HPX
Closing a Source Complexity Gap between Chapel and HPX
Shreyas Atre, Chris Taylor, Patrick Diehl, Hartmut Kaiser
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
A previous case study measured performance vs source-code complexity across multiple languages. The case study identified Chapel and HPX provide similar performance and code complexity. This paper is the result of initial steps toward closing the source-code complexity gap between Chapel and HPX by using a source-to-source compiler. The investigation assesses the single-machine performance of both Chapel and Chplx applications across Arm and x86.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections