Papers › Classification of LEO Satellites Using Occultations of Background Stars
Classification of LEO Satellites Using Occultations of Background Stars
Benjamin F. Cooke, Don Pollacco, James A. Blake, Paul Chote, Stuart Eves, Will Feline, Grant Privett
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We present the result of a proof-of-concept simulation designed to classify LEO satellites based on their occultations of background stars. We generate satellite shapes drawn from two broad shape classes, 'boxwing' and 'square'. We then simulate the resulting occultation photometry that would be caused by these satellites orbiting in LEO and intersecting with background stars. The resulting data is then inverted to attempt to recover the input shape and classify the satellite correctly. We find that the technique is theoretically sound, but ambitious with current telescope capabilities. We construct an equation for the required success rate of the method, as a function of exposure time and density of background stars. We find that successful classification requires short exposure times and high background stellar densities. For success rates in excess of 75%, we find a required exposure time of ∼2.0×10⁻³s, and ∼500 stars along the satellites path. Results are presented in terms of these two key parameters, and are discussed in the context of current observational capabilities and alternative satellite characterisation methods.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections