Papers › Classical benchmarking of Gaussian Boson Sampling on the Titan supercomputer
Classical benchmarking of Gaussian Boson Sampling on the Titan supercomputer
Brajesh Gupt, Juan Miguel Arrazola, Nicolás Quesada, Thomas R. Bromley
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Gaussian Boson Sampling is a model of photonic quantum computing where single-mode squeezed states are sent through linear-optical interferometers and measured using single-photon detectors. In this work, we employ a recent exact sampling algorithm for GBS with threshold detectors to perform classical simulations on the Titan supercomputer. We determine the time and memory resources as well as the amount of computational nodes required to produce samples for different numbers of modes and detector clicks. It is possible to simulate a system with 800 optical modes postselected on outputs with 20 detector clicks, producing a single sample in roughly two hours using 40% of the available nodes of Titan. Additionally, we benchmark the performance of GBS when applied to dense subgraph identification, even in the presence of photon loss. We perform sampling for several graphs containing as many as 200 vertices. Our findings indicate that large losses can be tolerated and that the use of threshold detectors is preferable over using photon-number-resolving detectors postselected on collision-free outputs.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections