Papers › Channel-Attention Dense U-Net for Multichannel Speech Enhancement
Channel-Attention Dense U-Net for Multichannel Speech Enhancement
Bahareh Tolooshams, Ritwik Giri, Andrew H. Song, Umut Isik, Arvindh Krishnaswamy
Supervised deep learning has gained significant attention for speech enhancement recently. The state-of-the-art deep learning methods perform the task by learning a ratio/binary mask that is applied to the mixture in the time-frequency domain to produce the clean speech. Despite the great performance in the single-channel setting, these frameworks lag in performance in the multichannel setting as the majority of these methods a) fail to exploit the available spatial information fully, and b) still treat the deep architecture as a black box which may not be well-suited for multichannel audio processing. This paper addresses these drawbacks, a) by utilizing complex ratio masking instead of masking on the magnitude of the spectrogram, and more importantly, b) by introducing a channel-attention mechanism inside the deep architecture to mimic beamforming. We propose Channel-Attention Dense U-Net, in which we apply the channel-attention unit recursively on feature maps at every layer of the network, enabling the network to perform non-linear beamforming. We demonstrate the superior performance of the network against the state-of-the-art approaches on the CHiME-3 dataset.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | CA Dense U-Net (Complex) | PESQ | 2.436 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | CA Dense U-Net (Complex) | SDR | 18.635 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | CA Dense U-Net (Complex) | ΔPESQ | 1.16 | #2 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | Dense U-Net (Complex) | SDR | 18.402 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | Dense U-Net (Real) | SDR | 16.855 | #4 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | U-Net (Real) | PESQ | 2.176 | #5 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | U-Net (Real) | SDR | 15.967 | #5 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | Noisy/unprocessed | PESQ | 1.27 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | CHiME-3 | Noisy/unprocessed | SDR | 6.50 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections