Papers › Challenging local realism with human choices
Challenging local realism with human choices
The BIG Bell Test Collaboration, C. Abellán, A. Acín, A. Alarcón, O. Alibart, C. K. Andersen, F. Andreoli, A. Beckert, F. A. Beduini, A. Bendersky, M. Bentivegna, P. Bierhorst, D. Burchardt, A. Cabello, J. Cariñe, S. Carrasco, G. Carvacho, D. Cavalcanti, R. Chaves, J. Cortés-Vega, A. Cuevas, A. Delgado, H. de Riedmatten, C. Eichler, P. Farrera, J. Fuenzalida, M. García-Matos, R. Garthoff, S. Gasparinetti, T. Gerrits, F. Ghafari Jouneghani, S. Glancy, E. S. Gómez, P. González, J. -Y. Guan, J. Handsteiner, J. Heinsoo, G. Heinze, A. Hirschmann, O. Jiménez, F. Kaiser, E. Knill, L. T. Knoll, S. Krinner, P. Kurpiers, M. A. Larotonda, J. -Å. Larsson, A. Lenhard, H. Li, M. -H. Li, G. Lima, B. Liu, Y. Liu, I. H. López Grande, T. Lunghi, X. Ma, O. S. Magaña-Loaiza, P. Magnard, A. Magnoni, M. Martí-Prieto, D. Martínez, P. Mataloni, A. Mattar, M. Mazzera, R. P. Mirin, M. W. Mitchell, S. Nam, M. Oppliger, J. -W. Pan, R. B. Patel, G. J. Pryde, D. Rauch, K. Redeker, D. Rieländer, M. Ringbauer, T. Roberson, W. Rosenfeld, Y. Salathé, L. Santodonato, G. Sauder, T. Scheidl, C. T. Schmiegelow, F. Sciarrino, A. Seri, L. K. Shalm, S. -C. Shi, S. Slussarenko, M. J. Stevens, S. Tanzilli, F. Toledo, J. Tura, R. Ursin, P. Vergyris, V. B. Verma, T. Walter, A. Wallraff, Z. Wang, H. Weinfurter, M. M. Weston, A. G. White, C. Wu, G. B. Xavier, L. You, X. Yuan, A. Zeilinger, Q. Zhang, W. Zhang, J. Zhong
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
A Bell test is a randomized trial that compares experimental observations against the philosophical worldview of local realism. A Bell test requires spatially distributed entanglement, fast and high-efficiency detection and unpredictable measurement settings. Although technology can satisfy the first two of these requirements, the use of physical devices to choose settings in a Bell test involves making assumptions about the physics that one aims to test. Bell himself noted this weakness in using physical setting choices and argued that human `free will' could be used rigorously to ensure unpredictability in Bell tests. Here we report a set of local-realism tests using human choices, which avoids assumptions about predictability in physics. We recruited about 100,000 human participants to play an online video game that incentivizes fast, sustained input of unpredictable selections and illustrates Bell-test methodology. The participants generated 97,347,490 binary choices, which were directed via a scalable web platform to 12 laboratories on five continents, where 13 experiments tested local realism using photons, single atoms, atomic ensembles, and superconducting devices. Over a 12-hour period on 30 November 2016, participants worldwide provided a sustained data flow of over 1,000 bits per second to the experiments, which used different human-generated data to choose each measurement setting. The observed correlations strongly contradict local realism and other realistic positions in bipartite and tripartite scenarios. Project outcomes include closing the `freedom-of-choice loophole' (the possibility that the setting choices are influenced by `hidden variables' to correlate with the particle properties), the utilization of video-game methods for rapid collection of human generated randomness, and the use of networking techniques for global participation in experimental science.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections