Papers › Chain-of-Choice Hierarchical Policy Learning for Conversational Recommendation
Chain-of-Choice Hierarchical Policy Learning for Conversational Recommendation
Wei Fan, Weijia Zhang, Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song, Hao liu
Conversational Recommender Systems (CRS) illuminate user preferences via multi-round interactive dialogues, ultimately navigating towards precise and satisfactory recommendations. However, contemporary CRS are limited to inquiring binary or multi-choice questions based on a single attribute type (e.g., color) per round, which causes excessive rounds of interaction and diminishes the user's experience. To address this, we propose a more realistic and efficient conversational recommendation problem setting, called Multi-Type-Attribute Multi-round Conversational Recommendation (MTAMCR), which enables CRS to inquire about multi-choice questions covering multiple types of attributes in each round, thereby improving interactive efficiency. Moreover, by formulating MTAMCR as a hierarchical reinforcement learning task, we propose a Chain-of-Choice Hierarchical Policy Learning (CoCHPL) framework to enhance both the questioning efficiency and recommendation effectiveness in MTAMCR. Specifically, a long-term policy over options (i.e., ask or recommend) determines the action type, while two short-term intra-option policies sequentially generate the chain of attributes or items through multi-step reasoning and selection, optimizing the diversity and interdependence of questioning attributes. Finally, extensive experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate the superior performance of CoCHPL over prevailing state-of-the-art methods.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections