Papers › Certifying C program correctness with respect to CompCert with VeriFast
Certifying C program correctness with respect to CompCert with VeriFast
Stefan Wils, Bart Jacobs
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
VeriFast is a powerful tool for verification of various correctness properties of C programs using symbolic execution. However, VeriFast itself has not been verified. We present a proof-of-concept extension which generates a correctness certificate for each successful verification run individually. This certificate takes the form of a Coq script containing two proofs which, when successfully checked by Coq, together remove the need for trusting in the correctness of VeriFast itself. The first proves a lemma expressing the correctness of the program with respect to a big step operational semantics developed by ourselves, intended to reflect VeriFast's interpretation of C. We have formalized this semantics in Coq as cbsem. This lemma is proven by symbolic execution in Coq, which in turn is implemented by transforming the exported AST of the program into a Coq proposition representing the symbolic execution performed by VeriFast itself. The second proves the correctness of the same C program with respect to CompCert's Clight big step semantics. This proof simply applies our proof of the soundness of cbsem with respect to CompCert Clight to the first proof.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections