Papers › CenterCLIP: Token Clustering for Efficient Text-Video Retrieval

CenterCLIP: Token Clustering for Efficient Text-Video Retrieval

2 May 2022arXiv:2205.00823archive 2025-07-28

Shuai Zhao, Linchao Zhu, Xiaohan Wang, Yi Yang

Recently, large-scale pre-training methods like CLIP have made great progress in multi-modal research such as text-video retrieval. In CLIP, transformers are vital for modeling complex multi-modal relations. However, in the vision transformer of CLIP, the essential visual tokenization process, which produces discrete visual token sequences, generates many homogeneous tokens due to the redundancy nature of consecutive and similar frames in videos. This significantly increases computation costs and hinders the deployment of video retrieval models in web applications. In this paper, to reduce the number of redundant video tokens, we design a multi-segment token clustering algorithm to find the most representative tokens and drop the non-essential ones. As the frame redundancy occurs mostly in consecutive frames, we divide videos into multiple segments and conduct segment-level clustering. Center tokens from each segment are later concatenated into a new sequence, while their original spatial-temporal relations are well maintained. We instantiate two clustering algorithms to efficiently find deterministic medoids and iteratively partition groups in high dimensional space. Through this token clustering and center selection procedure, we successfully reduce computation costs by removing redundant visual tokens. This method further enhances segment-level semantic alignment between video and text representations, enforcing the spatio-temporal interactions of tokens from within-segment frames. Our method, coined as CenterCLIP, surpasses existing state-of-the-art by a large margin on typical text-video benchmarks, while reducing the training memory cost by 35\% and accelerating the inference speed by 14\% at the best case. The code is available at \href{{https://github.com/mzhaoshuai/CenterCLIP}}{{https://github.com/mzhaoshuai/CenterCLIP}}.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2205.00823")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

mzhaoshuai/CenterCLIP officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1unverified

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from mzhaoshuai/CenterCLIP. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_cluster_inter mzhaoshuai/CenterCLIP/modules/cluster/cluster.py official repository unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 93f1c0cd5419e51b · report

Tasks

ClusteringRetrievalVideo Retrieval

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video Mean Rank 5.7 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video Median Rank 2 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@1 46.2 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@10 87.6 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@5 77.0 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text Mean Rank 5.5 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text Median Rank 2 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@1 46.7 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@10 88.0 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval ActivityNet CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@5 77.1 #20 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video Mean Rank 47.3 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video Median Rank 8 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@1 24.2 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@10 55.9 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@5 46.2 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text Mean Rank 41.3 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text Median Rank 7 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@1 24.5 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@10 55.8 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval LSMDC CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@5 46.4 #20 of 38 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video Mean Rank 13.8 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video Median Rank 2 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@1 48.4 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@10 82.0 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@5 73.8 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text Mean Rank 10.2 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text Median Rank 2 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@1 47.7 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@10 83.3 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSR-VTT-1kA CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@5 75.0 #26 of 63 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video Mean Rank 8.4 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video Median Rank 1 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@1 50.6 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@10 88.4 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) text-to-video R@5 80.3 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text Mean Rank 3.0 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text Median Rank 1 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@1 68.4 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@10 95.0 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval MSVD CenterCLIP (ViT-B/16) video-to-text R@5 90.1 #11 of 24 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

AttentionCLIPDense ConnectionsLayer NormalizationLinear LayerMulti-Head AttentionResidual ConnectionSPEEDSoftmaxVision Transformer

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections