Papers › CAWL: A Cache-aware Write Performance Model of Linux Systems
CAWL: A Cache-aware Write Performance Model of Linux Systems
Masoud Gholami, Florian Schintke
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The performance of data intensive applications is often dominated by their input/output (I/O) operations but the I/O stack of systems is complex and severely depends on system specific settings and hardware components. This situation makes generic performance optimisation challenging and costly for developers as they would have to run their application on a large variety of systems to evaluate their improvements. Here, simulation frameworks can help reducing the experimental overhead but they typically handle the topic of I/O rather coarse-grained, which leads to significant inaccuracies in performance predictions. Here, we propose a more accurate model of the write performance of Linux-based systems that takes different I/O methods and levels (via system calls, library calls, direct or indirect, etc.), the page cache, background writing, and the I/O throttling capabilities of the Linux kernel into account. With our model, we reduce, for example, the relative prediction error compared to a standard I/O model included in SimGrid for a random I/O scenario from 67 % down to 10 % relative error against real measurements of the simulated workload. In other scenarios the differences are even more pronounced.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections